New faculty disciplinary plan offered

A task force of University admini - strators and senior faculty mem - bers has proposed a substantial re - vision to the existing faculty dicip - linary procedures. In the future, the Univerity's & president and Faculty Senate & Chairpersons will have greater & power and responsibility in hand - ling faculty disciplinary actions, if the changes are accepted by the Board of Trustees. The revisions, which will be dis - cussed tonight at a faculty meeting, follow criticism of the handling of Associate Veterinary Professor & Robert Whitlock's plagiarism case. Critics complained, among other & things, that no consistent proce - dure was followed. The biggest procedural change would replace the current, separate judicial boards with one intra- departmental University tribunal. There would also be a provision for separating accusations into two classes, "major infractions" and & "minor infractions." According to the proposal, "major infractions" would be dealt with in a fairly complex manner, including a hearing before a faculty panel. "Mi - nor infractions," however, would be dealt with internally. In a statement, Faculty Senate Chairperson David Hildebrand said the "most controversial of the task force's proposals" is one giving the president a more important role in the disciplinary process. "There is a danger that the presi - dent after next might cave in to the hysteria of the moment, in a highly publicized case," he said. To check this, the draft suggests that if the president and the Faculty Senate-appointed tribunal dis - agree, he must get the consent of all three Faculty Chairpersons in or - der to proceed in the way that he chooses. Hildebrand said on Monday that he hopes the new procedures will be ratified before the end of the spring term.

Please note All comments are eligible for publication in The Daily Pennsylvanian.