Idrees Syed & Mak Hussain | Muslim students insist on more support

Guest Column | An open letter to Penn President Amy Gutmann

· February 22, 2012, 11:03 pm

Share This

Dear Penn President Amy Gutmann and University Officials,

As leaders of the Penn Muslim Students Association, in the past few days, we have dealt with the disturbing and saddening reports of surveillance of our organization by the NYPD. Even more disappointing, however, was the lack of a University response condemning the actions of the NYPD and expressing support for the Muslim Students Association at Penn and other targeted minority students on campus.

As a community of Muslims at Penn, we were disheartened by the lack of University public support for the Penn MSA. In the first statement posted by the University on its website, not a single mention of protecting students’ religious freedoms was mentioned, and even in the current version there is no mention of the vibrant role the Penn MSA plays in our campus community. An updated version of the statement, lacking Gutmann’s name, reads, “… the fact that students on our campus feel scrutinized simply because of their religious affiliation, race or national origin is a sad and troubling statement on our times.” No condemnation was made, but rather an acceptance of a troubling status quo. The ignorant culture of fear and suspicion around Muslims was simply accepted as a “statement on our times” by the University. But again, no condemnation was made. No specific support for the targeted students was given, replaced by vague claims about the value of all students. For our community, a feeling of isolation was unavoidable.

This is not the Penn we know and believe in. Penn’s admissions website reads, “Our diversity strengthens our foundation as a university and a community.” Both of us were attracted to Penn because of that diversity, and we have taken advantage of it throughout our time here. The MSA has sought out that diversity in our partnerships and collaborations, both within Penn and with the surrounding community. For example, our annual Family Fair unites many groups together to put on one of Penn’s largest events bringing the West Philadelphia community to campus.

We, as part of the Muslim community here at Penn, were expecting something more from the University. We were expecting to be assured as students that we are an integral part of the University. That our well-being mattered. That what the NYPD did was unequivocally wrong. We were surprised to learn that Yale University’s President, Richard C. Levin, did exactly what we had hoped Penn would do in a statement to all students, faculty, and staff. He writes, “I am writing to state, in the strongest possible terms, that police surveillance based on religion, nationality, or peacefully expressed political opinions is antithetical to the values of Yale, the academic community, and the United States.” He continues to express his and Yale’s full support for the MSA at Yale, “The Yale Muslim Students Association has been an important source of support for Yale students during a period when Muslims and Islam itself have too often been the target of thoughtless stereotyping, misplaced fear, and bigotry. Now, in the wake of these disturbing news reports, I want to assure the members of the Yale Muslim Students Association that they can count on the full support of Yale University.”

As students, we were disappointed that Penn took a different tone in its statement, writing, “The University cannot protect students from the harsh realities of the world we all live in.” We are led to ask: what is the function of a University that does not even express an intention to protect its students? Of an institution of higher education that does not strongly oppose challenges to the free thought and belief of its members? Of a community that does not stand up when its own are targeted and marginalized, but instead, furthers their isolation?

President Gutmann and University Officials, we are writing to ask you to show us this support. Show us that the University really cares about its students, especially minority groups, on campus. Show us that we can trust the principles this University stands for — diversity, freedom of thought and protection of rights — and condemn the NYPD’s acts and take clear action to support the Penn Muslim community and the Penn MSA in this matter.

Idrees Syed & Mak Hussain, both College juniors, are the vice president and president of the Penn Muslim Students Association. Their email addresses are isyed@sas.upenn.edu and hussainm@sas.upenn.edu.

Comments (11)

DisappointedSenior

February 23, 2012, 4:01 am

Flag this comment

Excellent op-ed. Thank you. Penn can and should do better.

PennSenior

February 23, 2012, 10:50 am

Flag this comment

I don’t see why the MSA is getting so upset by this. If they don’t want others to read their blogs, then don’t post it on a public website. The NYPD did the same thing anyone with an Internet connection can do. And what did the MSA expect Gutmann to say? She can’t police the Internet and protect Penn students. She supports the First Amendment, both the positives and the negatives with it.

build a fence

February 23, 2012, 10:53 am

Flag this comment

And the University needs to build a geodesic dome over MSA’s office so the Police can’t stand on the street (or fly nearby with a helicopter or UAV) and watch them.

bob

February 23, 2012, 1:54 pm

Flag this comment

im glad you took the time to write this. the issue isn’t about Penn actively stopping NYPD from its illegal surveillance. no one expects that. however Penn should not facilitate such activities, and when it discovers them should unequivocally support the students and condemn police activities that create fear and curb free speech

Chris

February 23, 2012, 8:03 pm

Flag this comment

@PennSenior

Actually you’d be against the 1st Amendment here- free RELIGION/speech/press and right to PETITION the government. Free speech is not violated- nobody is covering the NYPD’s mouth. (but maybe indirectly covering MSA’s mouth through intimidation)

This is simple- a government agency purported to fairly protect and serve all citizens is stereotyping a religious minority. But don’t expect Penn admins to “petition the gov” to protect Muslims. Maybe Hindus. Definitely Jewish.

sas11

February 23, 2012, 9:43 pm

Flag this comment

If a wealthy religious group on campus afilliated with the Hillel was targeted by the government like this, you can expect Amy Guttmann to bend over backwards in order to placate those concerns.

Michael Flaherty

February 24, 2012, 12:02 am

Flag this comment

Here’s a newsflash for “Syed” and Hussain: If your co-religionists would stop blowing up people, flying planes into buildings, beheading innocent journalists, and brutalizing women and minorities, perhaps the scrutiny wouldn’t be needed—which it obviously is now. All this “victim” pleading by the Islamists always ignores the brutal reality of radical Islamic murderous terrorism worldwide. Get a grip.

Chris

February 24, 2012, 4:03 am

Flag this comment

@Michael Flaherty

I’m an Atheist with little religious interest but even I can appreciate the difference.
Do Haredi Jews represent all Jewish people? No? Do some of the questionable actions of Israel represent all Jewish people? Definitely No. So why should Fundamentalist Muslims represent all Islam people- especially peaceful patriotic Muslim-Americans that are your fellow classmates?

What you just did- calling the authors “religionists” is disgusting. Please “get a grip” on the issue yourself.

Ganesha akbar!

February 25, 2012, 12:43 pm

Flag this comment

Do the Hamas-huggers of MSA have any 1st Amendment right to propagandize on behalf of terrorist groups? Anti-terrorism laws made that kind of assistance illegal, calling it “material support” for terrorism itself. Last year, The Supreme Court upheld the law in a 6-3 decision that stopped an aid organization from consulting with the PKK.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7845379/Anti-terror-law-upheld-by-US-Supreme-Court.html
=
The Supreme Court has upheld a federal law that bars “material support” to foreign terrorist organizations, rejecting a free speech challenge from humanitarian aid groups.

The court ruled 6-3 Monday that the government may prohibit all forms of aid to designated terrorist groups, even if the support consists of training and advice about entirely peaceful and legal activities.

Material support intended even for benign purposes can help a terrorist group in other ways, Chief Justice John Roberts said in his majority opinion.

“Such support frees up other resources within the organization that may be put to violent ends,” Roberts said.

Hamas would be one such example. Hamas have conducted numerous terrorist massacres of Israelis, Americans and other innocents.

Propagandizing for Hamas allows terrorists to use money elsewhere and allows them to not have to dip into propaganda funds for their terrorist activities.

So, a big thank you to Hamas-huggers everywhere for allowing Obama’s NSA to track your criminality and Holder’s Justice Department to prosecute your unregistered and illegal “material support” propaganda campaigns for Hamas.

Good luck with that.

Ganesha akbar!

February 26, 2012, 11:13 am

Flag this comment

[Chris whines: “stereotyping a religious minority”]

Fun Fact: The NYPD investigations protect ALL Americans including the vast majority of Secular Muslims (interested in reform) from a tiny minority of Islamo-supremacists in MSA. Conversely, academia demonstrates moral cowardice for abandoning our defense of human rights.
http://www.centerforinquiry.net/isis

Secular Muslims applaud the NYPD for protecting our right to live free and equal (like all Americans) from the bonds of Islamo-supremacism and sharia law.

ac

February 26, 2012, 6:33 pm

Flag this comment

Thank you for writing this well thought out letter. I hope the University responds accordingly.

Comments are closed for this item.