Protesters storm campus after Cantor cancels visit

Cantor's office was told Thursday that Penn could not ensure 'attendance policy'

· October 21, 2011, 1:38 pm

Elizabeth Jacobs | DP

Protesters gather inside Huntsman Hall after House Majority Leader Eric Cantor canceled his Wharton Leadership Lecture slated for Friday afternoon in Huntsman Hall.


Amid Occupy Philadelphia protesters and discrepancies in the attendance policy, United States House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) canceled his Wharton Leadership Lecture slated for Friday, Oct. 21 at 4:30 p.m. Cantor had planned to speak at Huntsman Hall about income inequality.

ERIC CANTOR: Wharton remarks, as prepared for delivery

“The Office of the Majority Leader was informed last night by Capitol Police that the University of Pennsylvania was unable to ensure that the attendance policy previously agreed to could be met,” Cantor spokeswoman Laena Fallon wrote in an email. “Wharton is a educational leader in innovation and entrepreneurship, and the Majority Leader appreciated the invitation to speak with the students, faculty, alumni, and other members of the UPENN community.”

His absence didn’t deter activists, however, who assembled inside and outside Huntsman.

“It appears [Cantor] doesn’t want to talk to the 99 percent,” said Jamie Mondics of advocacy group Keystone Progress, after learning of the canceled speech.

GALLERY: Photos of protesters on campus

Vice President for Public Safety Maureen Rush said the Division of Public Safety increased security efforts around the site of the protests and continued to monitor and adjust its presence throughout the day.

DPS spokeswoman Stef Karp estimated that about 500 demonstrators were at the protest.

Protesters entered Huntsman by force through Au Bon Pain and occupied the lobby, shouting chants such as “Eric Cantor, come out, come out wherever you are” and “We are the 99 percent.”

VIDEO: Protesters in Huntsman

DPS officers “formed a human chain to make sure they couldn’t come into Wharton, into Hunstman,” past the lobby, Rush said.

As a precaution, DPS officers also went around to classrooms and group study rooms, locking them from the outside so no one could enter any rooms.

“As long as they don’t disrupt anyone, they’re allowed here,” said a DPS official on the scene.

“We gave them the opportunity to speak their piece,” Rush said.

The protesters eventually left on their own accord, and as of 4:40 p.m., no protesters without PennCards were in the building.

No arrests were made due to the protests, and Anne Gemmell — Fight for Philly political director and liaison to Friday’s protest coalition — worked with DPS to help ensure no violence would occur.

“I have nothing but the highest regard for Maureen Rush and Penn DPS,” Gemmell said. “They did everything they could to ensure the success of this event and also to ensure the safety of the Penn students.”

“This is just very shocking. I don’t know what to say,” College sophomore Kathy Liu said. She didn’t know that Eric Cantor was coming to speak, or that he had canceled the event as a result of the anticipated protesters. “And the fact that it’s in front of Huntsman…”

“Yeah, it’s definitely really ironic,” finished College sophomore Elizabeth Diggs.

REACTIONS: Online responses to Cantor’s cancellation

As the protesters sang chants in call-and-response, most college students looked on in disbelief around the outskirts of the group.

Religious Studies professor Anthea Butler stood outside Huntsman Hall, armed with a smartphone and her camera. “I’ve known [about this protest] for a week, because I had been following Occupy Philly,” she said. She thinks most people didn’t know that this protest would be happening because everything was planned through social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter.

“I think that’s the general consensus of Penn kids right now,” said Liu. “No one knows what’s going on.”

College sophomore Emily Hantverk, who was watching the protest with Liu and Diggs, added, “But this is all clearly having an impact.”

Others, however, weren’t as affected by the protest.

Wharton and Engineering senior Wilson Pulling was working a group project in Huntsman’s forum when the protesters entered the building. Pulling said the protests did not disrupt the project.

“It only interrupted [our meeting] in that I went outside to see it,” Pulling said.

College Republicans president Charles Gray was disappointed by the protest. It’s “unfortunate” the protesters are “highjacking this event and making it into something that’s a bit hostile,” the Wharton and College senior said.

Gray, a Daily Pennsylvanian columnist, added that he doesn’t blame Cantor’s office for canceling his speech. “They have to respond to the extreme rhetoric that’s out there.”

The speech was scheduled several months ago and was to be open to members of the press and the Penn community.

Thursday night, however, the Office of the Majority Leader was informed that the first 300 people would be admitted to the lecture, regardless of affiliation to the University. All Leadership lectures are open to the public, according to Wharton spokesman Peter Winicov.

Friday morning, Cantor’s office learned of the anticipated protesters through press reports.

About 500 to 1,000 protesters affiliated with Occupy Philadelphia planned to march from City Hall to Locust Walk in front of Huntsman to protest Cantor’s presence, according to Keystone Progress Executive Director Michael Morrill.

Penn spokesman Ron Ozio said in a statement that Wharton’s speaker series “is typically open to the general public, and that is how the event with Majority Leader Cantor was billed. We very much regret if there was any misunderstanding with the Majority Leader’s office on the staging of his presentation.”

The statement continued, “Wharton deeply regrets that the event … has been canceled. The University community was looking forward to hearing Majority Leader Cantor’s comments on important public issues, and we hope there will be another opportunity for him to speak on campus.”

“I think it’s a shame that a speech at a university should not occur because of some fear that there will be skeptics and critics in the audience,” said English professor Al Filreis, who signed a statement expressing solidarity for the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Filreis added, “Clearly, the reason he canceled was that he wanted to speak to a friendly audience, and not one that would ask him difficult questions.”

Grace Ortelere and Diksha Bali contributed reporting to this article.

***

This article was updated from its original version at 2 a.m. Monday.

Comments (92)

Really?

October 21, 2011, 2:01 pm

Flag this comment

That is absurd. Representative Cantor is a coward. I love Congress because it represents the voice of the people in our government, and when an elected official can’t handle a demonstration because a group of people disagrees with him, he should step down. I’m not part of the Occupy movement but he just handed them a victory. If he had given the speech and refused to talk with them, he would have just shown that he doesn’t care about a large group of Americans. Now he’s just shown that he’s running scared. Pathetic.

Mitch

October 21, 2011, 2:16 pm

Flag this comment

Eric Cantor was right to cancel his speech. Who wants to see a bunch of union thugs shout down the Congressman? Pearls before swine are never appreciated properly.

Robert

October 21, 2011, 2:29 pm

Flag this comment

Come on people. We all knew this was going to happen. Why would someone who is taking their time to speak to our university willingly subject himself to all the BS that he would have to deal with when the “99%” clowns start yelling and disrupting his speech. I don’t understand why the university can’t just check Penn Cards at the door and allow this to be a speech to the university members only.

Johnny Whiplash

October 21, 2011, 2:33 pm

Flag this comment

Maybe he realized that defending the absurdly rich in a speech about income disparity wasn’t such a smart idea.

Nathan

October 21, 2011, 2:34 pm

Flag this comment

Thanks to all the people out on the streets screaming, I now have less of an opportunity to listen to and take part in an informative discourse. This is a win for nobody. Everybody loses. Gotta love the Occupy movement.

The Truth Teller

October 21, 2011, 2:46 pm

Flag this comment

Eric Cantor was trying to have an intelligent dialog with the students and teachers at Penn. He doesn’t need to waste his time in a pre-planned shouting match.
Cantor can raise a million dollars for the GOP in the time he would have spent at Penn. You guyes blew it.

eb

October 21, 2011, 2:49 pm

Flag this comment

I’m glad he’s not speaking. I think its an embarrassment to the University to have that pro-corporate guy spout his nonsense.

Rich Pliskin

October 21, 2011, 2:58 pm

Flag this comment

Congratulations to the Penn community for exposing the cowardice of this loathesome wuss.

CAS 1984.

Ellen Gluck

October 21, 2011, 3:07 pm

Flag this comment

Eric Cantor is a coward. As an elected official, he should understand and embrace that the questioning and challenging of our government’s policies is a cornerstone of our democracy. The fact the the House Majority leader doesn’t have the guts to speak in an environment where his comments may be challenged is very sad.

ACJ

October 21, 2011, 3:26 pm

Flag this comment

We need to show more respect to prospective Penn visitors! A great opportunity to hear from an important member of our government was lost because we are too immature to express opinions civilly.

miller

October 21, 2011, 3:35 pm

Flag this comment

Eric Cantor had every right to back out of this speech. He thought that this was going to be attended by those who would ask questions that he submitted to them to ask. Why should he have to answer questions from those who he does not represent, i.e. the poorest 99%. Why should he answer questions that lobor unions may ask such as better pay, health benefits and safety in the workplace. Remember, if the masses receive more pay, then an Senior exec will make less. If the make less, then money cannot trickle down so the masses can make better pay.

Mitch

October 21, 2011, 3:47 pm

Flag this comment

Let’s not forget that the Wharton Business School is mainly for students who want to be part of the 1 percent.

Bob

October 21, 2011, 3:59 pm

Flag this comment

Cantor’s a coward, plain and simple.

Eugene Debs

October 21, 2011, 4:18 pm

Flag this comment

WHAT DO WE WANT? – DEODORANT! WHEN DO WE WANT IT? – NOW

Wharton Junior

October 21, 2011, 4:30 pm

Flag this comment

UPENN’s staff should be embarrassed for their handling of this situation. A great opportunity to create a dialogue between the majority leader and students was lost.

While I sit here studying in Huntsman Hall, working my butt off to prepare myself best I can to one day “move up the ladder”, there are roughly 100 protestors screaming for handouts and socializing our country.

The system should be built to allow people to succeed, it is impossible to build a system where everyone is successful.

Re: Wharton Junior

October 21, 2011, 4:54 pm

Flag this comment

Wharton Junior… If you listen to what they are saying they aren’t calling for Socialization. Cantor is a Tea Party candidate… They are polar opposites. How are his views any better? Being on the extreme of any idea is not the best place to be. It allows no compromise. And when you finish your degree and head to Wall Street you’re going to see a lot more of this. Occupy movement or not. Also, UPENN’s staff did a great job. They allowed free speech to happen. Cantor had his chance. HE ELECTED NOT TO TAKE IT!

PS I’m not a Protester. I’m not a staff member.

CAS Sophomore

October 21, 2011, 4:57 pm

Flag this comment

This is ridiculous. Why would anyone want to subject themselves to being shouted at by people whose primary occupation seems to be protesting? Penn should have just made the speech only open to the Penn community. And to those of you who are just saying “Oh, good for us, we got him to cancel,” way to prove you’re not actually interested in having a discussion. You’re only interested in shouting until everyone’s ears are ringing and no one wants to talk.

C' 14

October 21, 2011, 5:28 pm

Flag this comment

Could not agree more with CAS Soph. and Wharton Junior, Today was a chance for open dialogue, not just “Softball” questions, and crazy, entitled liberals who only want to hear themselves talk ruined this opportunity. Quit wasting your time and ours, go back to work, or school, or probably being bums. If you have problems take care of them yourselves, work your way up the ladder, and don’t depend on the government to do it for you—99% of the time they are going to let you down. The best way to bring down the 1% is to aspire to be like them, make your self better, don’t bring people down to build yourself up. Historically America is the land of opportunity, the thing about opportunity is you, as an individual, has to go out and grasp opportunity to make it work. Entitlements and hand-outs will only hurt us more. Quit crying and get to work.

SAS Econ major from Canada

October 21, 2011, 5:29 pm

Flag this comment

pbreau1@gmail.com, lynnbreau@gmail.com

SAS Econ major from Canada

October 21, 2011, 5:33 pm

Flag this comment

Eric Cantor is a complete coward. Sure.

But still, we live in a DEMOCRACY, where BOTH sides have the right to be heard. The crowd, supposedly espousing views of “direct democracy” actually made this a one-sided conversation, which is VERY undemocratic.

Also, as a Penn student, I’m really disgusted with the Penn administration. This is a private institution and I don’t think that students should be deprived of the opportunity to listen to an argument from an influential politician, however much that argument may be flawed, just because Penn is all weak-kneed about free speech.
Honestly, why let the protesters onto Locust? Why let them into the Hall? Make it Penn-card only due to high-demand?

Penn should be looking out for its students, staff, and faculty … not for how its perceived by a bunch of people who wished they were alive to go to Woodstock…

College 10

October 21, 2011, 6:25 pm

Flag this comment

@SAS Econ major

Penn administration, like the police in NYC, cannot take away the right to demonstrate or gather, whether it is on Locust Walk or not.

Also, what does “weak-kneed about free speech” mean? Not that it’s really mentioned much anymore, but I’m pretty sure freedom of speech is one of the most highly valued rights we have as Americans.

Law Student

October 21, 2011, 6:43 pm

Flag this comment

@ College 10

Are you kidding me? Locust Walk is Penn’s Campus which is PRIVATE property. No one has a right to protest on another person’s property.

It’s embarrassing that Penn handled it this way.

@law student

October 21, 2011, 6:53 pm

Flag this comment

True no one has the right to protest on private property, but Penn is one of the most, if not the most, liberal schools in the Country, do you really think they would ever repress free speech in any circumstance?

Elizabeth

October 21, 2011, 7:19 pm

Flag this comment

It is odd how people dish out mistreatment to others and then run scared for their own pathetic lives.

Cantor can preach hate, but can’t hear truth…what a coward!

Treat yo self

October 21, 2011, 7:57 pm

Flag this comment

We here at Penn are the proud 1% of the smartest and most talented people in the world. Occupiers – as you claim to be the other 99% – please take your incomplete HS transcript, sub 2000 SAT scores, elementary reasoning ability and lack of noteworthy ambition to an institution or environment that can better relate to you.

Comments are closed for this item.