Penn vs Sword | Fit for curriculum

There are benefits to colleges requiring obese students to take physical fitness courses

· January 14, 2010, 5:48 am

Share This

One in three. That’s how many Americans suffer from obesity. And every year, we spend $117 billion (according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention) dealing with obesity’s consequences.

Recently, Lincoln University in nearby Chester County, Pa., decided to do something about this epidemic. To graduate, incoming students with a Body Mass Index above 30 — a commonly used threshold to determine obesity — had to enroll in a fitness or sports course, or lower their BMI below 30.

After an outcry from some, administrators canceled the requirement in December. Sensitivity trumped public health.

That’s a shame. More universities in this country (Penn included) should adopt similar requirements. Schools must value physical health just as much as intellectual development.

Criticism of the program erupted across the country in November after Lincoln student Tiana Lawson attacked the requirement in the student paper, The Lincolnian. “I came here to get an education which, as a three-time honor student, is something I have been doing quite well, despite the fact that I have a slightly high Body Mass Index,” she said.

I understand where Lawson’s coming from. One of the main purposes of college is to improve our intellect.

But colleges also shape who we are as members of society. As Lincoln’s Health Department Chairman James DeBoy told The Chronicle of Higher Education, schools “are responsible for students’ total well-being, not just academic and cognitive, but physical and social.”

Detractors also claimed the requirement was discriminatory because it only applied to obese students. If that’s true, maybe I should sue Penn. Here’s why: When I came here, the only Spanish I knew despite my teachers’ best efforts was “Hola” and “Yo no comprendo.” To graduate, I had to take additional foreign language courses, but my bilingual friends didn’t have to. Given all the verbs I had to conjugate, Penn owes me at least $1 million dollars in “pain and suffering” compensation.

Seriously though, it’s important to realize students come into college with different abilities. Some (like me) couldn’t communicate in another language if their lives depended on it. Others are bright in all subjects but have trouble maintaining a healthy weight. Universities use requirements to ensure all students leave with a basic skill set when they graduate. That isn’t discrimination.

More recently, other professors called the fitness requirement “paternalistic.” Of course it is. So is forcing you to speak a foreign language, do basic calculus and write in English. Colleges are all about being paternalistic. It’s what they do.

Unsurprisingly, most Penn students I talked with were a little uneasy with the idea of a fitness requirement and questioned exactly how universities could implement it. As College freshman Carson Ley said, “With the stress of academics, it’s hard to force people to exercise.”

At first, I felt the same way. I’ve come to realize, though, that colleges can implement this program in a sensitive manner that doesn’t damage a student’s self-esteem and provides valuable information about personal fitness. And according to Lincoln sophomore Sharnice Smith, who had to take the fitness course, that’s exactly what Lincoln University did. “The professors did not broadcast my weight,” she told The Lincolnian. “The process was not discriminating at all.”

Thousands of other students could benefit from the same “life lessons” Smith learned if other colleges adopt similar requirements. In doing so, universities should use multiple metrics to identify obesity, because relying solely on the BMI could lead to inaccurate results. Universities should also exempt obese students with extenuating circumstances on a case-by-case basis.

But for the rest of us, it’s high time that colleges value personal health just as much as Math, English, Science and yes, Español.

Ashwin Shandilya is a Wharton senior originally from New Market, Md. He is the outgoing Marketing Manager and former Editorial Page Editor of the DP. His e-mail address is shandilya@dailypennsylvanian.com.

Comments (3)

pennten

January 14, 2010, 2:51 am

Flag this comment

So, it's fine to be anorexic or bulimic, but it's not one's right to be obese?

Also, can you, after taking your requirement class, communicate in another language now? Requirements are generally useless and we just fulfill them; they normally don't change our lives. So, what makes you think this would change the way an obese person lives his/her life? Instead, he/she would have just one more step to graduation, and one more requirement to get out of the way.

Who needs high school gym again? And Lincoln University's option of students' lowering their BMI below 30 is essentially endorsing cheap and even potentially deadly weight loss tricks.

Seem fair? I don't think so.

confused

January 14, 2010, 12:13 pm

Flag this comment

If you seriously think that required classes are "generally useless and we just fulfill them," then you have wasted (are wasting?) your time at in school. Penn offers classes just plain boring and poorly taught classes, but Penn also offers classes that wholly enrich one's life. Why squander this opportunity? You probably should have spend the extra 30 minutes each semester to hunt down rewarding classes, you would have learned how to hold and express a thought that stands up to basic rigor.

First, very few people, if any, think that anorexia or bulimia are "fine." To the contrary they represent a very real and strong danger. They scare loved ones, and strike families with pain and suffering. If by chance you refer to the American love affair with painfully skinny women, then you almost have a point. We do certainly encourage harmful behavior, but at the same time, still, no one believes that anorexia or bulimia are "fine." In fact, through analogy, just as we laud home run records but condemn the ones who juiced their way to the the spot, we also laud physical beauty but don't support unhealthy methods of attaining it.

I support an initiative for basic health and fitness requirements. The university already requires vaccinations (except in certain case by case exceptions). Yes, no one needs high school gym again, but the university has the resources to create more interesting classes in a variety of topics so that the student may choose one of interest. This probably didn't occur to you because you don't seem to take any care in choosing your classes.

How many people do you know, in their mad rush to grind out requirements and not enjoy them, that use unprescribed Adderall, drink way too much coffee, and maintain dangerous levels of stress? Isn't this entire outlook on the educational system just as bad? The university doesn't encourage this. It's a crucible of your own making. Would anyone truly believe that the university "endorses" these things (even "essentially endorses" these things)?

The requirement of a certain bmi seems half baked and should be handled in a more sophisticated way, but requiring basic fitness does seem fair. Not all colleges will do this, and one can just choose to go to a different school(or so classical economics would lead us to believe). Think of this as an ethics class educating students on their responsibility to their family, friends, society, and most importantly themselves to maintain their health. It costs the rest of us less money as a society, and family members less emotional hardship. Think outside your bubble sometime, you might find it enlightening.

b82

January 14, 2010, 1:40 pm

Flag this comment

I, now a graduate student at Penn, went to undergrad at Brandeis. Brandeis does require an individual take two physical education classes (or pass out with a fitness test). I think more schools should have that requirement. BUT THERE IS A MORE IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT IN MY OPINION. Brandeis used to have a swimming requirement. For whatever reason, they stopped the requirement. Had my friend taken had to fulfill such a requirement, he surely would have swam to safety like his friends on a study abroad trip did. But, not knowing how to swim, he unfortunatelly didn't make it.

Colleges should teach us much more than just academics. What we learn might just save our lives. I am not sure why colleges have moved away from such requirements.

Comments are closed for this item.