Historical Commission committee approves hotel at 40th and Pine | Interactive Feature
· December 3, 2008, 5:00 am
Developers' plans to build an 11-story extended-stay hotel at 40th and Pine Streets received unanimous approval from the architectural committee of the Philadelphia Historical Commission last week.
The committee's decision has no legal bearing on the hotel's construction, but its recommendation will be factored into the decision of the full historical commission. Developers need the commission's approval because they want to build the hotel next to an old Italianate mansion.
On Dec. 12, the developers will present a revised plan to the commission for its approval.
The architectural committee stipulated in its endorsement of the project that developers modify two aspects of the hotel's restaurant portion, according to Tom Lussenhop, one of the project's developers and a former Penn managing director of real estate.
In accordance with that stipulation, Lussenhop said, architects are considering alternative building materials and a different organization of windows on the restaurant's fa‡ade to "make the historic mansion more prominent in the eyes of pedestrians."
David Fineman, a lawyer representing local residents who oppose the hotel's construction, said his clients were "disappointed" by the Nov. 25 decision.
However, Fineman said, his clients "will continue to object to it as it goes before the historical commission and will take court appeals" on future hotel-related decisions with which they disagree.
The hotel has been a source of contention between developers and area residents for the past year.
Some community members object to the hotel because they believe its planned size and design do not fit the character of the neighborhood.
But developers say the hotel would provide visitors to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with much-needed extended-stay housing.
Fineman said he believes the developers will be unable to get zoning approval because "the historical nature of the mansion is compromised" by the planned hotel.
Yet he added that he has "no expectations" for the outcome of the Dec. 12 historical commission hearing.
Lussenhop, on the other hand, said he was "optimistic" about the hearing.
"In any complex urban development project that has multiple review processes, you come to expect the unexpected, but we've listened hard and made changes," he said.
The historical commission did not return repeated calls for comment on this article.




Comments (2)
Tom Servo
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
While I agree that the size and design do not fit the character of the neighborhood, I feel that the planned hotel is much needed and will only benefit the area both economically and aesthetically. Currently, the site severely underutilized. The 'historic mansion' right now is just a vacant building, and in my opinion, an ugly one. I strongly disagree with the previous commenter's opinion that this new development will increase crime. Likewise, I feel that the bridge cinema is hardly a "game preserve for muggers and drug dealers to being a blight". It was and is a good idea. The 40th street area is much safer than it was, is much more attractive to local residents and students alike, and will only be improved by the presence of this new hotel.
More Bad Planning for 40th Street
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
You would think that by now the officious empty drums who have been busily destroying 40th Street would hang their heads if not in shame at least with a degree of humility. The murder and critical wounding of two innocent bystanders on 40th Street a few weeks ago might be a clue that 40th Street planning has been nothing short of a disaster. Youth Gangs roam 40th Street on evenings and weekends, thanks to the crime hot spot created by people who, undoubtedly, don't show their faces on 40th during the evenings and weekends. What was supposed to be an arts film house on 40th & Walnut became instead a blockbuster movie house which is rarely attended by Penn students and infrequently attended by any other than teens from the area, creating the first ingredient of a crime hot spot. The McDonalds across the street has long been a place where teens from the area gather at night. So too the arcade on 40th and Spruce. Now we shall add an ugly hotel that upscale clients will quickly abandon when they discover that leaving the hotel means walking into drunks stumbling out of Copa Banana and troubled youths looking for, well, trouble. Like the "luxury" Bridge Cinema, this "luxury" hotel will quickly devolve from being a game preserve for muggers and drug dealers to being a blight, and along the way it will drive out homeowners not only around the hotel but for blocks around. Homeowners are what make the neighborhood stable and safe. Students make neighborhoods unstable and dangerous. Bizarre combinations of businesses in this already fragile mix will in short order return Penn to the dangerous place it once was, as homeowners (so painstakingly and expensively attracted to the neighborhood by Rodin's careful planning) shall be driven away by Gutman and company's careless lack of planning and sensitivity to a delicate and precariously balanced community. Taxes are very high in Philadelphia, and so too is crime. Schooling choices are poor. It's not easy living with student and crime culture. UCD leaders and influencers had better take heed. They've been making a bundle of mistakes of late, and it's showing in terms of crime and turnover in housing stock. You lose the homeowners, the families, and the neighborhood will revert in a heartbeat to the old days of students and faculty routinely getting raped, mugged, and murdered.
Comments are closed for this item.