Robb sentenced 5 to 10 years in prison for killing his wife
Ex-prof charged with voluntary manslaughter says he wishes he could 'turn back the hands of time'
· November 20, 2008, 5:00 am
Former Economics professor Rafael Robb is "remorseful" for killing his wife, Ellen, Montgomery County Common Pleas Judge Paul Tressler said yesterday, and Robb is not likely to commit another similar crime.
But Tressler also said he wanted to ensure that Robb would not interfere too much in the life of his teenage daughter, Olivia.
Balancing those sentiments, Tressler sentenced Robb to five to 10 years in prison and 10 years probation for bludgeoning Ellen Robb to death with a chin-up bar in December 2006.
The sentence is in the standard range for voluntary manslaughter, the charge Robb pleaded guilty to in November 2007.
Tressler also ordered Robb to pay for Olivia's grief counseling and to establish a trust for her college education.
Robb, who resigned from the University shortly after he pleaded guilty, will receive credit for time served in prison since he was arrested in January 2007. He will be first eligible for parole in 2012.
At the hearing, Robb, 58, was visibly emotional and apologized to his daughter and his dead wife's family.
"My only wish is that I could turn back the hands of time," Robb said.
The sentence was a compromise between the defense's request for a sentence less than the standard range of four-and-a-half to six years and the prosecution's push for a harsher sentence.
Defense attorney Frank DeSimone said he believed Robb should receive a short sentence because he acted in a moment of rage stemming from anger built up due to Ellen Robb's mental-health state.
The defense's witness, forensic psychologist William Russell, said medical records and interviews he conducted with Rafael Robb show that Ellen Robb was suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder, attention deficit disorder and depression.
She had taken 27 different medications over the last few years of her life, many of which contained the mood-lifter serotonin.
As a result of the disorders, Russell said, Ellen Robb exhibited behaviors that frustrated Rafael Robb, such as hoarding boxes purchased online and continuing to bottle-feed Olivia until she was about 6 years old.
"Dr. Robb was basically storing up and storing up and storing up anger," Russell said.
At the time of Robb's guilty plea, he said he "just lost it" during a fight with Ellen over Olivia's upcoming vacation plans. He said he then grabbed the chin-up bar and started beating her.
Prosecutors, however, painted Robb as a lying, manipulative and controlling man.
Art and Gary Gregory, Ellen Robb's brothers, said Ellen told them sheProxy-Connection: keep-alive Cache-Control: max-age=0
ecame reclusive and depressed because Robb was controlling.
Art Gregory also presented a letter Robb sent to Olivia on Tuesday, in which he told her he would not send her holiday presents until she sent him a photograph of herself and her most recent report card.
Robb has also been trying to control the number and nature of Olivia's therapy sessions, said Art Gregory, who is now Olivia's guardian.
In the end, Tressler recognized points presented by both sides.
Tressler said Ellen Robb was "severely ill," which both prosecution and defense witnesses confirmed.
He said Robb killed his wife out of rage and that Robb was living in bad circumstances he could not alter for fear of losing custody of his daughter if he got divorced.
Tressler added that Robb's letter to Olivia convinced him that Robb should not receive a sentence lighter than the standard range because it demonstrated his controlling nature.
After the hearing, DeSimone said he was "satisfied" with the sentence and would not appeal.
Prosecutor Bruce Castor said he wanted Robb to receive a harsher sentence but called it a compromise.
Castor, the former district attorney, is now a county commissioner but was named a special prosecutor for the case.




Comments (8)
Rachel
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
I used to work in a coffee shop that Rafael and Olivia visited at least once a week. I also served Ellen several times. She was a very kind woman, although shy and quiet whenever Rafael was around. Whenever Rafael would come in, he would read the paper or his paperwork and ignore little Olivia. He was also very impatient with her and very controlling. I always felt bad for her and wondered why he bothered to bring her if he was so annoyed by her company. It is not surprising to me in the least that Rafael was capable of such a brutal murder. He was self-absorbed, controlling and mean. The prosecution should be ashamed for letting him off with such a light sentence. It seems that no one even took into account the fact that he lied and tried to cover up the murder until his temporary "rage induced" insanity plea could be introduced.
Sarah - Penn staff
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
This sentence is ridiculously short. I mean, don't people caught with drugs get at least that long if not longer in prison? I'm glad Robb is remorseful, but he intentionally beat his wife to death. He should defintely have to serve more than 5-10 years for that. And, I can't believe his wife's mental health issues were concerned a mitigating factor. If this choice is to get separated and risk losing custody of your daughter or killing your wife who is mentally ill but is not physically abusing anyone, the choice is clear. He should have to take more responsibility for his own actions.
bfg
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
This sentence is an absolute outrage. The man bludgeoned his wife to death and will be out jail in a little more than 3 years from now. I had a family acquaintance get 5 to 7 years in jail for insurance fraud. He spent 4 years in jail before being released on parole. Not to say he didn't deserve the sentence (I believe he did), but it shows how absolutely ridiculous this sentence is. This man got away with murder, literally. What a disgrace.
Alum
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
It is hard to swallow this sentence in comparison, for instance, to the sentence Edward Anderton just received for identify theft. How can stealing money and killing someone result in such similar sentences?
Alum
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
The man beat his wife beyond recognition in the process of killing her with a chin-up bar. The defense attorney said he "acted in a moment of rage." Do you know how many "moments" it takes to beat someone as savagely as he did? It's very simple- I'm sure he feels remorseful, but the time for "feelings" was before he took an innocent life with his own hands in a brutal and beastly way. This sentence is an outrage.
It's called a plea deal
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Absolutely ridiculous sentence, but it saved the Court time & money.
David N. Foley
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
How could prosecutors offered such a deal. Voluntary manslaughter. A prior blog commented on how long it must have taken him to achieve this beating. And he tried to make it look like a burglary? And then he sets conditions on sending his daughter a present? The only appropriate response to his conduct would be a sentence of life in prison without parole! This is an outrage.
LYNHMYC
June 26, 2010, 5:54 am
Flag this comment
ality. The payment of a Birkin pledge straighten from $6,000 to a full $50,000. Who knew that solitary movement pledge price and so hugely since this? If you inclination to acquiesce a Birkin bag, you swallow to wait whereas at early 6 to 7 caducity before you rap set sole. Unless you are a well-lov
Comments are closed for this item.