A Hill Field relay race: They're off! (And they're out)

At Pride Games, gay groups battle varsity squads to raise awareness

· April 1, 2008, 5:00 am

Share This

It's not often that the men's and women's track teams compete against each other. It's even rarer that they tie in a relay. And it's almost unheard of that the men's track team would simply brush off the result and eat pie next to its opponents.

Penn's first-ever Pride Games, however, were not a place for arguing between groups divided by gender, race or, most importantly, sexual identity. The event on Hill Field Sunday afternoon was planned and coordinated by Queer Student Alliance Outreach director - and women's track mid-distance runner - College sophomore Anna Aagenes, as part of QPenn, Penn's annual lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender pride and awareness week.

"I really wanted to get my different communities involved - the athletic community and LGBT community," she said. "We wanted an event that we could have a lot of fun doing and we could get lots of different people involved [in], and I think we did."

Members from the two track teams, the volleyball team, the women's club rugby team, the LGBT Center staff, LGBTQ graduate-school students, QSA and Queer People of Color - about 70 people total - competed against each other.

Each of the eight squads wore a different color T-shirt, so when the teams posed for a final picture, they portrayed a rainbow, an international symbol of gay pride.

The men's track team, dressed in matching green shirts, headbands and biker shorts, predictably raced to a commanding lead, with victories in the three-legged and wheelbarrow races. The volleyball team, clad in white, came up just short in each.

Yet a pure athletic advantage was not enough to carry the male varsity runners.

Their biggest struggles came in the drag race. Each person had to run to a cone, don a female's shirt, hat and purse and race back to the starting line. The next participant then put on his teammate's drag clothes and repeated the task. The main problem? The shirts were too small.

They regained form to earn a first-place tie in the egg-balance race. All the athletic teams struggled in the pie-eating contest - won by the LGBT Center staff - allowing the men's track team to narrowly escape with the win.

"We trained for this for about a week," senior mid-distance runner John Guzman joked. "We had rigorous activities ranging from cheesesteak eating to wind sprints."

Ultimately though, the event was not about winners and losers. As all the athletes were quick to point out, this event had farther-reaching goals.

"I think it's a good way to bring everyone together," said volleyball junior Stephanie Gwin, who, like all of the varsity-athlete participants, is straight.

"Especially in the athletic community, there's a lot of stereotypes of athletes being homophobic, so we're openly supporting the [LGBT] community."

Aagenes, a lesbian, praises her teammates for their "incredible support" of her homosexuality but knows that even today there are difficulties for gays in athletic environments.

"We still have a lot of work to do in terms of getting people to feel more comfortable coming out and making people feel more comfortable in their sexual identities, especially on athletic teams because they're difficult places to come out," she said. "You have to be on the bus with these people, you have to be in locker rooms with these people, so if they're not understanding of your sexual identity it could be difficult."

After the competition ended, participants from all groups mingled over free water ice and drinks. They talked and laughed as Aagenes intended, not divided by anything, especially their differing sexualities.

Comments (1)

Erin

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

As a Pride Games participant who had a blast, I want to thank Anna for organizing a fun and groundbreaking event. I also want to thank the cosponsors -- especially the Student-Athlete Advisory Council -- for 'putting their necks out there' and supporting an LGBT event. I have many issues about the article, as it skewed what was a grand day for all involved. First, I wonder if the writer asked every vasrsity athlete present if she or he identified as straight before writing that "all the varsity-athlete participants [were] straight." Did he ask any other participants their sexual orientations, or just assume we were all queer? I do not know about the varsity athletes, but I do know that some of the people on other teams identify as heterosexual. And, amazingly enough, there were some participants who identify as *both* a varsity-athlete and queer, folks totally overlooked in the article. It really did not matter how participants identified to those who were there, because we just wanted to raise awareness around the importance of diversity -- espcially regarding sexual orientation and gender identity -- in athletics. The other major flaw in the article was the sexist assumption that the men's track team would "predictably" win. In this day and age, I cannot believe someone would write such a thing. And, for the record, the two teams tied for second place -- the women's track team and the LGBT Center staff, were respectively, all women and had the oldest participants. I guess those results were too 'unpredictable' to even report. Again, kudos to Anna and other who planned a fabulous event, which I hope becomes a tradition despite such poor coverage.

Comments are closed for this item.