Stetson Departure | Trustees not told reasons for exit
Many not briefed on why Stetson left, and some want answers
· October 18, 2007, 5:00 am
The Board of Trustees is the University's highest governing body, but some trustees are still in the dark about the reasons behind the departure of former Dean of Admissions Lee Stetson.
About half of the trustees who spoke to The Daily Pennsylvanian said they had not been told why Stetson abruptly resigned in late August. Other trustees declined to comment and would not reveal if they knew why Stetson left.
University officials have refused to reveal the circumstances behind Stetson's resignation, and Penn President Amy Gutmann has only said that his departure was in the "best interests" of Stetson and the University.
Gutmann may be pressed to elaborate on that statement when the Board of Trustees meets for its annual fall meeting at the Inn at Penn today.
In interviews with the DP, some trustees have expressed curiosity and anger with the lack of disclosure, saying they should know more about the situation.
"I damn well better get some better information" at the meetings, said one trustee who was granted anonymity because of the sensitivity surrounding Stetson's departure.
The trustee added that it is especially disconcerting that, besides not having been told why Stetson left, the Board of Trustees also lack information about current plans for the admissions office moving forward.
"I think we've been kept too much in the dark," the trustee said.
In the months since Stetson's resignation, the University has been extremely tight-lipped in protecting the reasons behind his departure, and few top-level administrators have been told about the circumstances behind the resignation.
Though trustees are not always briefed on decisions involving University administrators, some have expressed surprise that the University has not been more forthcoming to its highest governing board.
Trustees said they had been informed of Stetson's resignation in an e-mail from the University, which was described by one trustee as "very short."
The e-mail only indicated that Stetson was resigning, without further explanation or elaboration, trustees said.
Several trustees emeriti also said they did not know the reasons behind Stetson's sudden departure.
While the trustees emeriti did not express the same anger as those more closely associated with the University, they did say they were curious about the situation.
"I will read it," one said in reference to an explanation of Stetson's departure, adding, "I'd like to know why he left."
Stetson initially announced his resignation in July, after having served as dean of admissions for 29 years.
In August, however, his resignation suddenly and without explanation became effective immediately.
Stetson has not responded to phone calls for comment, and Gutmann and University spokeswoman Lori Doyle have repeatedly refused to provide further explanation for Stetson's departure.




Comments (7)
John
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Given how much money they usually have to pony up to enter trusteehood, it hardly seems like an avenue to financial gain...
Ricky Ricardo
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Looks like there's gonna be some 'splainin to do. Hopefully, we'll get some transparency and the truth will finally come out.
Alum
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
alum, There are 54 trustees. You can read their names here: http://www.upenn.edu/secretary/trustees/TrusteeNameList.html Do you really think that most of these people don't care about the well-being of Penn or its students, and are serving as trustees merely to line their own pockets (and violate their legal fiduciary obligations as trustees, incidentally)? To believe that would require an unreasonable--and unhealthy--level of cynicism.
alum
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
[QUOTE id="71141f0d-2352-43b3-8838-e77de5d8fbaa"]They may not know what to do about it (the public safety issue), but I find it hard to believe that the Trustees don't care. If they didn't care about Penn, which includes the physical safety of its students and staff, they wouldn't be Trustees.[/QUOTE] Has it occurred to you someone might want to be a trustee for reasons other than the wellbeing of the students? Ron Perlman, for one, got the exclusive security contract for his holding company. Go check where some of the billions in construction dollars end up. I am sure if a group of trustees really care about safety at Penn, they would question the hiring of so many city pensioners at Public Safety. Penn is now a wonderful place for city cops to retire to.
Alum
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
They may not know what to do about it (the public safety issue), but I find it hard to believe that the Trustees don't care. If they didn't care about Penn, which includes the physical safety of its students and staff, they wouldn't be Trustees.
Goose
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Or they don't care.
Lucy
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Maybe the Trustees can work on the public safety department while they're at it.
Comments are closed for this item.