Jamie France | E-mailing, like, whatever to profs
For students and professors struggling with e-mail etiquette, keeping it formal is the safest choice
· March 23, 2007, 5:00 am
'What's in an e-mail sign-off? A lot, apparently. Those final few words above your name are where relationships and hierarchies are established, and where what is written in the body of the message can be clarified or undermined."
This quote was taken from an article by New York Times reporter Lola Ogunnaike on the issue of "netiquette," or online etiquette.
Few people realize the importance of small details in their online communication. A "Warmest regards," an "All the best," and a "Sincerely" may imply entirely different meanings, depending on the audience. It is important for e-mail writers to evaluate each audience separately and, for college students, each professor separately.
Recently, I discovered that the way students address their professors in e-mails - their diction and tone included - has become a significant topic of conversation (and sometimes controversy) among college faculty. Few students realize the gravity of their salutations and sign-offs in e-mails to their professors, and how these seemingly minute details impact the way professors receive their students.
The problem is that many of us, like, write how we talk, or whatever. We don't consider how this affects our student/teacher relationships.
Using an informal tone with a professor when it's not completely warranted or forgetting to proofread and spell check e-mails is a figurative slap in the face to most professors.
"Too many typos say: I don't care; I'm not taking you seriously," admitted Thomas Devaney, a professor in the Critical Writing Program, in an e-mail interview.
Devaney conceded that, in most cases, the professor will set the tone for e-mail correspondence with his or her students. But if the student is the first to write, it is important for them to assume a formal and respectful tone. If you offend your professor right off the bat - and you can never be sure what your professor will find offensive - you're diminishing your chances of receiving the response you're looking for. This is a rather clear concept.
But students are not always the ones in the spotlight: A similar tumult resides on the faculty side as well. Professor Valerie Ross, director of the Critical Writing Program, has witnessed several discussions on this topic in staff meetings and elsewhere.
In an e-mail interview, she noted: "None of us quite knows what tone to use in an e-mail when we are addressing strangers or venturing into unequal power relationships. Should we be chatty, comical, formal, humble, belligerent, demanding, assuming, pleading, placating?"
The use of certain greetings and closings can be additionally threatening.
The salutation sets the tone for the rest of the e-mail, and the way you address an individual, whether of lower or higher status, can make or break you. As a first-semester freshman, I was unaware of the importance of the Mr./Ms./Professor distinction. I had been writing to professors for nearly half a semester, ignorantly addressing them as Mr. or Ms., before my psychology professor decided to express his discontent. Talk about an awkward situation.
Surprisingly, however, many professors toil over the same dilemma. "I am uncomfortable writing: 'Hi Jamie,' but I also know that students can feel uncomfortable getting 'Dear Bill' or 'Dear Ms. Wong.' I have offended a few students by replying on a first name basis to their e-mails; others find the formal salutation off-putting," wrote Ross.
Evidently, students and teachers feel equally uneasy about their self-presentation in e-mail communication. So how can we find a common ground? It seems that establishing netiquette standards and publicizing them to the community is the only way to relieve this tension.
A possible solution, as proposed by Ross, suggests that we (1) "drop all salutations and closings (all Dear, Hi, Greetings, etc.)," and (2) "confine ourselves to formal titles and last names in the opening and closing of our e-mails."
Students and professors should also be wary of the content included in their e-mails. Avoiding jokes is a good idea, as they can be easily misunderstood. We've grown so accustomed to writing with sarcasm or wit to those who know us well that we often forget the following: professors/students just might not get it.
Refrain from asking for generous favors in e-mails. Such requests will be much better received on both ends if asked in person.
Save personal matters and complaints for private meetings. You never know which students or professors will feel no shame in sharing your e-mails with their peers.
And, when in doubt, stay after class.
Thank you for your time,
Ms. Jamie France
Jamie France is a College freshman from Plantation, Fla. Her e-mail address is france@dailypennsylvanian.com. Le Petite Freshman appears on Fridays.




Comments (3)
Maureen
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Nicely done. As a staff member that sometimes reviews job applications sent via email, I am often surprised how informal the cover emails are. While not always the case, these are overwhelming from younger applicants, including Ivy League graduates. Making a good, professional first impression is crucial.
Penn 08
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Well done. As an undergrad, I constantly struggle deciding what tone to take on when emailing professors, and this article laid out the complexities of the issue nicely. It was well researched and written and I feel like I learned something from it. Keep up the good work.
Howard Berman
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
It has been my experience that Professors will respond even to correspondents outside their class or even school such as myself (the year I graduated from Penn is 1990) when etiquette is observed and when the point made or question asked is serious and worthy of a response. I have been successful a good 30% of the time. Two additional points. Professors like an interest in their work and the culture of the sciences including the social sciences is more conducive to such informal communications by email, I believe because they are more of a collective undertaking and further because of the working of status in the sciences as opposed to the humanities
Comments are closed for this item.