Jailed sex offender's fate still unknown
Judge to decide by Jan. 31 if grad student can return to campus
· January 25, 2007, 5:00 am
A judge will decide within the next week whether jailed sex offender and Penn student Kurt Mitman will be allowed to return to campus, though any release from prison will likely be accompanied by additional security.
Last week, University officials discovered that Mitman, a first-year Economics graduate student who is serving a jail sentence on child-molestation charges, was commuting to class from a Bucks County prison as part of an academic-release program.
At a hearing last Wednesday, County Judge Theodore Fritsch suspended Mitman's academic release and gave the county Men's Community Corrections Center until Jan. 31 to draft a new release proposal that would provide for more monitoring provisions if Mitman were allowed to return to classes, said Richard Fink, Mitman's attorney.
According to School of Arts and Sciences Graduate Admissions Coordinator Patricia Rea, Penn officials met yesterday to discuss Mitman's status with the University, though spokeswoman Lori Doyle said Tuesday that the University will abide by the court's decision.
"That's at the judge's discretion at present," Doyle said.
Philadelphia criminal attorney Patrick Artur said Bucks County District Attorney Diane Gibbons has always opposed academic-release privileges for sex offenders and will likely ask Fritsch either to limit Mitman's privileges to the Bucks County area or to keep him in prison for the remainder of his sentence.
Gibbons could not be reached despite repeated attempts for comment.
Artur added that one of the issues prosecutors are likely to scrutinize is the fact that Mitman attends school in Philadelphia.
In a city so large, he said, there is a risk of losing control over Mitman's activities.
Another consideration is that Philadelphia is outside of the Bucks County court's jurisdiction, Artur said.
Fink said he believes Fritsch may allow Mitman to return to campus under increased security and with possible conditions, including monitored phone conversations and prohibition from contact with minors.
But even if Mitman is allowed to return to Penn, he may become an outsider to the University community.
"We as a nation have gone bananas with sex crimes," Artur said, adding that Mitman is more likely to face threats and hostility since his sex-offender status has become common knowledge.
But for Mitman, publicity from the incident has already led to rejection from his immediate community.
The incident "has already immersed him in enough publicity that he's getting harassed at the prison," Fink said.
He added that Mitman may be able to resume a normal life on campus when the Penn community stops seeing his presence as a risk.
Students "will probably start ignoring him pretty quickly because he isn't a danger," Fink said.
Mitman pled guilty in March 2005 to involuntary deviate sexual-intercourse charges with a 14-year-old boy and was sentenced to two-and-a-half to five years in prison.
He began attending Penn in September 2006 after enrolling in the academic-release program.




Comments (3)
Tom
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
The particulars of Mitman's case does bother me (and I say this without knowing much details). A 22 year old had sexual relations with a 14 year old. This is a very gray area, we aren't talking about the harshness of a 40 year old man going after a 14 year old boy. Plenty of young twentysomethings have slept with teenagers and society generally doesn't bat an eye. Given that the judge involved and the prison ranked Mitman a very minimal risk, and given the lightness of the sentence, and given that he's at a as minimum security prison as one can be, I sincerely doubt that Mitman poses any real threat to society. My gut feeling is that Mitman was proscecuted because the mother of the boy is rabidly anti-gay and can't come to terms with her own son's homosexuality. Consequently, she took advantage of the loopholes in the legal system to prosecute Mitman. Mitman made a mistake in sleeping with one of his charges as a camp counselor, but I do know that had I been 14 and a pretty 22 year old camp counselor made moves towards me, I'd have made every attempts to sleep with her. Had Mitman been female, I doubt the mother would have prosecuted him. As it is, the kid (and yes, at 22 years old Mitman was very much still a kid) made a mistake, and society's reaction is to keep hounding at him?
Not so fast...
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Mitman is NOT "a guy who has served his time". He is still in prison, just being allowed out during the day to go to school. He has NOT completed his sentence yet. And who's to say that there aren't any 14-year-olds attending Penn? Haven't you heard of child prodigies? Besides, I was 17 when I started my freshman year, and I'm sure a lot of freshman are 17. A minor is a minor - ANYONE under 18.
Philadelphia Resident
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
This is dispicable. Why is this guy being run over hot coals just to attend Penn? Last I checked, there are no 14 year old boys (or girls) attending Penn, so I don't understand the threat that he is posing to the community. He is a citizen of our country and is entitled to education, work, and all the other benefits that everyone else is entitled to. Instead, just like Rafael Rob, he has been convicted in the court of public opinion as posing a threat to our school and the students who he comes into contact with. Everyone at Penn needs to get a grip on reality. Here's a guy who has served his time and is obviously qualified to attend Penn graduate school. So how about letting him do what he needs to do to turn his life around and I'm sure he won't pry into your personal life either.
Comments are closed for this item.