Alleged rape at Duke has been overblown by the media

Duke professors and media hounds are simply inciting additional problems by weighing in on the incident

· April 19, 2006, 5:00 am

Share This

The Duke University campus has become a stomping ground since allegations of a rape emerged several weeks ago. On one front are the media, which have spent the past few weeks "standing on campus - until one tiny piece of news comes out. - It doesn't change anything," Duke senior Christian Kunkel said. Even though indictments were only filed on Monday, over the past few weeks the dominant media outlets have engaged in lazy journalism by slipping into predictable discussions of race in America. Smaller - and nastier - media outlets have seized onto the lack of DNA evidence to smear the alleged rape victim as a race-baiting liar. "The media is not tuned at all to what Duke is feeling. - People on campus just want to know what happened," Kunkel said. Unwilling to wait for the facts to emerge, the second wave of premature judgment has come from the academic world; academia's curious propensity for hyperventilating has been on full display since this scandal broke out. At Duke, "some people are saying that some professors on campus were really quick to demonize the team, [and] that they are trying to get press for themselves," said Danny Willner, a University of North Carolina junior who spent a semester last year at Duke. Indeed, even before Monday's sealed indictments, some at Duke had already made reckless outbursts in response to this case. Houston Baker, a Duke English professor, demanded in an open letter that the panicked Duke administration do more to stop the "drunken white male privilege loosed amongst us" by expelling the entire lacrosse team and its coaches. The uncertainty of the case did not stop Duke's Progressive Alliance, a student activist group, from distributing flyers imploring members of Duke's lacrosse team to "please come forward." To help interested parties find and "encourage" these team members, the poster featured the names and photos of as many lacrosse players as they could get before Duke pulled the head cuts from their Web site to protect the safety of the team members. The common thread running through these irresponsible reactions and this lazy journalism is that they relentlessly emphasize the whiteness of the Duke lacrosse team and the blackness of the alleged rape victim. These gestures suggest that the vile depravity of the alleged rape is outweighed by the race of those involved and the airing of grievances about Durham's town-gown troubles. "A lot of people get focused on her identity, and we kind of lose a little bit of how this is a crime against women," said Robert Korstad, a history professor at Duke. "People are using this [issue] to advance their own agendas," Kunkel said. "A girl was probably raped. She should be the one getting the attention and the support." This is indeed the wrong time for the media and academia to saddle this case with more emotional baggage than it needs. If Duke students are convicted of rape, they will be found guilty on the basis of their individual choices. Given that academia is supposed to be the realm of balanced, patient inquiry, it is disheartening to watch the academic ideal spill blood on the soil of Durham. And I doubt that such a crisis would play out any better at Penn or at many other universities. There are many colleges that have tense relations with their surrounding environments, spoiled jocks and overzealous academic and community leaders. All it takes is a single spark before everyone is spinning a vile incident into a circus. People "jump to incredible conclusions," Korstad said. "They have so little evidence in front of them and are trying to piece this together. If you don't know very much, it's hard to come by an educated opinion about it." To the academics, activists, pundits and reporters who are writing about this case: Remember that the world is not always as clear as it seems from behind your computer screen. Without realizing it, you may be prejudging, overanalyzing and inciting. As Duke Provost Peter Lange said in an e-mail responding to professor Baker, remedying this situation "will take less rhetoric and more hard work, less quick judgment and more reasoned intervention, less playing to the crowd [and more] entering the hearts and lives of those [whom] we wish to restore and heal."

 

Columnist Eric Obenzinger is a College senior from Manhattan, N.Y.

 

Comments (3)

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

I agree that the whole incident has created a media frenzy. If no sex occurred, and no DNA evidence has been found, then what definition of rape are DA Mike Nifong and other prosecutors alleging? Possibly an assault took place, but reports state she reported for duty with bruises, and that she was highly intoxicated. Is this a ploy by a woman who purposefully arouses men for a living, with two other mouths to feed, to gain a financial settlement? Meanwhile, the entire team is painted with the same brush as the accused three men who attacked her. If you really want to hear of an overreaction, read the story in the Syracuse Post Standard at www.syracuse.com, "Duke Transfers Unwelcome Here." You think Duke English prof Houston Baker is wrong to recommend the entire team and coaching staff be expelled? Try the defense of Syracuse Athletic Director Daryl Gross. He says he will not allow any Duke lacrosse players to transfer to SU, and that he is "inclined to deter" those high school seniors who committed to Duke for next year, and are now being released from their obligation, from coming to SU as well. Do you think Gross has had his judgment clouded by his blackness? Gross calls this a "teaching moment." I think so, too. Innocent until proven guilty. This reminds me of grade school, where the teacher decides to punish the entire class until the one perpetrator owns up to his misdeed. Why has the Duke University administration found it necessary to force the coach, Mike Pressler, to resign? How was he involved, by recruiting aggressive players who raised their team to a ranking of No. 2 in the nation? The team has a higher incidence of offenses than the general student population, mostly public intoxication and public urination. Now there's a heinous offense rarely seen on college campuses! Not only are the team and the school being cast in a dim light, but the "affluent" parents and private schools are condemned also. If there is a violation against this young woman, I hope the assaulter is convicted. However, if nobody goes to jail at this point, you can thank the media for the race riots and increased racial tensions that will follow. Chas, Consultant Rochester

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

drunken white male privilege loosed amongst us? Sounds like a Friday night on campus at Penn. Sexual assault is just an acute symptom of the disease. quinn, student penn mighty.quinn.the.eskimo@gmail.com

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

With columns like these, it's no wonder women like me are terrified of reporting. It was traumatic enough without the risk of being attacked for coming forward. Scared to tell

Comments are closed for this item.