Study: Non-profs teach many College classes

Dean says student's work is misleading, profs teach 'core' of undergrad curriculum

· March 31, 2006, 5:00 am

Share This

[Ryan Jones/DP File Photo] Graduate students attend a meeting of GET-UP last year. The group issued a study showing that professors teach a minority of College courses.


A study released last week revealed that last fall, only 40 percent of College of Arts and Sciences courses were taught by professors who were tenured or on tenure track.

But administrators say the numbers may not be as telling as they seem.

Of the 1,228 classes offered -- not including recitations -- 490 were taught by full professors. Lecturers, adjunct faculty and graduate students taught the bulk of the classes last semester.

The report, called "Casualized Penn: Where Did The Professors Go?," was released by Graduate Employees Together -- University of Pennsylvania, a graduate student group seeking recognition as a union by the Penn administration.

The study was conducted by third-year Ph.D. student Ciara Kehoe. She used Penn's online Course Register to tabulate all the College courses offered last fall. She then used the Penn Directory to identify the job classification of each instructor: professor, lecturer or graduate student.

A similar report was released by the Graduate Employees and Students Organization, a counterpart to GET-UP, at Yale University a few years ago.

However, College Dean Rebecca Bushnell said that the data presented in the report were skewed. She said that, because of the nature of the SAS curriculum, there are numerous language classes and writing seminars that are taught by trained language instructors or professional teachers and are also capped at 15 to 20 students per class.

"Tenured and tenure-track professors are still teaching the core undergrad program outside of the language and writing classes," Bushnell said. "Our peer institutions do exactly the same thing."

But GET-UP representatives say Penn undergraduates are not getting their money's worth.

Because the Penn administration relies on temporary instructors -- who are paid less than tenure-track professors -- students are not being taught by faculty members who are working at the cutting edge of their fields, GET-UP spokesman Bill Herman said.

Herman added that many of the junior lecturers and graduate students are often underpaid and do not have job security for the next semester.

As a temporary instructor, "one has so many other things to worry about. ... That becomes a huge distraction when teaching a class," he said.

Bushnell is confident that the SAS will acquire more and more tenure-track faculty. Her strategic plan -- a five-year proposal that she laid out when she was appointed dean in 2004 -- calls for a 10 percent increase in the number of tenure-track faculty in the next five years.

However, College junior Dylan Bordonaro -- who is taking a Cinema Studies class taught by a visiting faculty member -- said that having non-professors teach a class sometimes allows more student-teacher interaction and brings a new perspective into the class.

"While on one hand you don't have all the knowledge that professors have ... people who aren't so busy with their research are better communicators of knowledge, as opposed to a professor on tenure," Bordonaro said.

Comments (2)

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

It is Ms. Bushnell's shameless spin on this topic that is skewed, not the data. We literally studied every for-credit class in the college, and a majority are taught by temps. All ambiguities were reported conservatively, i.e., in a way that overestimated the number of tenure-eligible faculty who teach classes, recitations, and labs. I urge anyone to read the report at: http://www.getuponline.org/casualization/CasualizedPenn.pdf By referring to a minority of classes as the "core" of the curriculum, Bushnell dismisses the actual learning experience and expectations of most students. Language and writing classes are a core part of the college curriculum, but the administration believes the people who teach these classes don't deserve job security and decent pay. A sizable number of undergrad classes (17%) are taught by people who teach at Penn part time, have no benefits, and make as little as $4700 per class before taxes. If you think research is a distraction, try working 3 jobs and living without health insurance. Penn charges tuition of $32k/year. Doesn't that give the school enough to ensure that all its teachers have good working conditions? After all, teachers' working conditions are students' learning conditions. Bill Herman, PhD Candidate, ASC; GET-UP spokesperson Philadelphia

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

As one of the much maligned part-time professors/instructors mentioned here, I agree with the basic premise. Penn (and other schools, for that matter) should hire more full-timers and stop exploiting part-time professors. I have a Ph.D., have written two books, presented at national conferences, and have over eight years of teaching experience, yet get paid a grand total of $4950 to teach an occasional class at Penn (virtually the SAME amount I get at one of the local state universities). I would, however, disagree with the suggestion that the part-timers are somehow less "cutting edge" than the tenured professors. I know many adjunct instructors who have outstanding records in scholarship and teaching, in some cases superior to tenured profs. The problem that we face is an exceedingly tight job market, particularly in the humanities where typically 200 to 300 candidates vie for a single position. More than a few tenured faculty members will admit they would never have secured their positions today in the much more competitive job market. An Instructor

Comments are closed for this item.