Graduate students protest Rodin book signing
· October 27, 2003, 5:00 am
Graduate student Joe Cytrynbaum, center, participates in a protest against University President Judith Rodin's book signing on Saturday at the Penn Bookstore. [Rebecca Chin/The Daily Pennsylvanian]
For graduate students looking to unionize, a long-awaited discussion with University President Judith Rodin about graduate student unionization may soon occur.
About 80 members and supporters of Graduate Employees Together-University of Pennsylvania rallied in front of the Penn Bookstore Saturday to protest the University administration's continual refusal to drop the appeal that is keeping the votes for graduate student unionization impounded.
The protest took place at 2 p.m., coinciding with Rodin's discussion and signing of Public Discourse in America: Conversations and Community in the Twenty-First Century, which she co-edited with Executive Director of the Penn National Commission on Society, Culture and Community Stephen Steinberg.
"The book talks about civil rights," GET-UP Co-Chairman Joseph Cytrynbaum said. "Given this is what her book is about... we want to point out that this is what we are about, too."
Cathy Barlow -- a recently graduated master's student from the College of General Studies -- voiced many of GET-UP's concerns about Rodin's tight-lipped attitude toward graduate students about unionization.
"It goes against everything she said in the book," Barlow said. Graduate students "are the very community spoken about in the book."
And in response to her remarks, Rodin verbally agreed to discuss the situation for the first time.
"We are surprised and happy about that particular outcome," GET-UP spokesman Dillon Brown said. "This newfound willingness to talk is keeping with the message of her book."
The organization is now planning to write a letter formally requesting a meeting with Rodin.
In February, in a process overseen by the National Labor Relations Board, a group of University-employed graduate students were allowed to vote on whether they wanted to form a union. The election's results will not be tabulated unless the University's current appeal is overturned or Penn decides to drop it altogether.
"I am concerned that the legal appeal is closing the possibility for public discourse," GET-UP member and third-year English graduate student Jonathan Hsy said.
These feelings were shared by most protesters, many of whom found Rodin's discussion "a little hypocritical," GET-UP Mass Action Committee Chairwoman Katie Paugh said.
Many GET-UP members felt that the topic of Rodin's book "blatantly contradicts her attitude toward us," third-year history graduate student Sarah Van Beurden said. "To see her as a champion for public discourse on campus bothers me."
GET-UP said the choice of time and place for their information picketing was not a casual one.
"It seemed the perfect opportunity to have our voices heard," Paugh said. "I agree with what Judith Rodin has to say, but I don't think her actions concord with her writings. We will ask her to address this disjuncture."
GET-UP also said they aimed to raise awareness of Penn parents during Family Weekend, and while some parents said the protest was not appropriate for the occasion, GET-UP members distributing flyers in front of the bookstore said that many stopped to ask for information.
Inside the bookstore, Rodin focused on "the degradation of public engagement," mostly due to the negative effects of mass media.
"The purpose of discourse is to hear what the other side has to say," she concluded.
Steinberg said that a community is formed through the coming together of a group of people for the completion of a task.
At the end of the presentation, the question-and-answer session was substituted with individual chats during the book signing.
"Apparently, she didn't want to talk to us," said GET-UP member and third-year music graduate student Jennifer Saltzstein, who was present at the event.





Comments (6)
Reader
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
I firmly believe that regardless of the fact that I'm taking high-difficulty graduate courses, and am technically a student, the University should be grateful for my labor and should worship the ground I walk on for having to take 3-4 hours a week to have to sit in a recitation and listen to scrappy undergraduates pathetically try to look intelligent. The university owes me the farm and they know it. Cortez, union member JERK-OFF
Reader
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
I got a pretty good deal as a TA at the University of Washington--which did not cause me to limit my support for the union in any way. Whether graduate student employees are getting a fair deal or not is a issue for the bargaining table, and not an issue of whether or not they have a right to bargain with the university. Rodin appears not to be a profound thinker on this one. Tom Quinn, law student san francisco
Reader
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
What Andrew said. I attend the University of Michigan, another big Research I institution that has somehow managed to absorb the incredible "burden" of a graduate employee union while keeping tuition costs below Penn's--and that's in a city with a higher cost of living than Philadelphia. A university's budget is a statement about its priorities. Having graduate education anywhere be inaccessible to those with families, those with health insurance needs, or any other sub-group of the population shouldn't be anyone's priority--certainly not that of one of the best American universities. Alyssa, graduate student University of Michigan AlyssaPicard@hotmail.com
Reader
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
Graduate employees teach and grade 70% of undergraduate classes at Penn, but few receive a living wage or adequate healthcare. Plenty of graduate employees in GSE and GSFA do not even receive the tuition benefits that Clay cites. Poorly paid, sickly, and overworked TAs are less likely to be effective teachers than those with a strong contract, and a university that spends less than 2% of its $3 billion endowment each year on operating costs should have little trouble in finding the resources to provide decent benefits. Perhaps students concerned about tuition need to organize themselves, as 31,000 English undergrads did over the weekend to protest tuition hikes - I know plenty of GET-UP activists would support them. Improving access to and the quality of undergraduate education and grad employees organizing to improve their living and working conditions are not incompatible at all. Andrew, TA Philadelphia
Reader
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm
Flag this comment
GET-UP folks should stop whining about getting paid over $40,000 a year (free tuition and stipend, plus other potential perks). By appealing the election results, the University demonstrated its commitment to undergraduates, who would foot the bill for a potential union. Undergraduates, who PAY $40K each year to attend Penn, should thank the administration for their support, and should continue to voice their opposition to the greedy unionizers. Clay Shooter, Fighting the Greed West Philadelphia clayshooter@mail.com
LYNHMYC
June 25, 2010, 2:29 am
Flag this comment
captivated to prepare a alibi initiation on the goods we sell.Louis Vuitton heart a include mismated found esteem terms of framework used, namely Louis Vuitton Monogram, Graffiti, Damier and Vernis replica handbags. unbefitting each fixed design, adept are again sub-categories such due to handle Mat
Comments are closed for this item.