Daniel McQuade: Vote for a candidate, not a party

Guest columnist

· October 30, 2003, 5:00 am

Share This

First, an anecdote: sometime in the early '60s, Philadelphia Mayor Richardson Dilworth gave a speech at a school supporting the implementation of a city parking tax.

Philadelphia residents responded, naturally, by throwing rocks at the mayor. Hours later, the mayor left the school, his case unmade.

The parking tax was never implemented.

The point: everyone's just throwing rocks. Nobody's listening to the issues. No, not literal ones, at least not yet, but people are throwing barbs without thinking.

Earlier this week, you may have read not one but two columns endorsing Sam Katz for mayor of Philadelphia. One was from the chairman of the College Republicans, Daily Pennsylvanian columnist Dan Gomez; the other, of course, was from the chairman who immediately preceded him, David Copley.

In the interest of fairness, I thought it'd be nice to hear from someone who has actually lived in Philadelphia for longer than, oh, a year or so.

Now, don't get me wrong: Dan Gomez and David Copley are fine writers, and they made many valid points on why you should vote for Katz.

But let's be honest: members of the College Republicans would vote the party line regardless of whether the mayoral candidate was Katz or Punxsutawney Phil.

Gomez said he was confused about why the race was close. Please: Philadelphia Democrats not only elected Frank Rizzo, they re-elected Wilson Goode after the MOVE fiasco, where C4 was dropped on a city block. Although I'm a lifelong Philadelphian, I'm not a Democrat. The thought of voting for a candidate based on his party is abhorrent to me.

In another moment of honesty, let's go with this: neither Katz nor incumbent John Street are exceptional candidates. On one hand, you have Katz, who's never held an elected public office. On the other, you have Street, who committed the sin of all sins: sending a letter to Kobe Bryant apologizing for fans booing him at the 2002 NBA All-Star Game.

I would love to spend this space telling you to vote for Socialist Workers' candidate John Staggs as a protest -- he has some interesting ideas -- but I can't logically vote for a candidate whose platform includes independence for Puerto Rico. That's not quite the type of leadership I'm looking for.

No, Street is the choice for mayor of Philadelphia for the next four years.

The majority of criticisms of Street have been based on anecdotal evidence and overgeneralization. The FBI probe? We don't know what it's about yet. The bomb materials tossed into Katz's office? I don't know what news reports you've been watching, but I haven't seen Street being indicted for it. And does anyone really care that Street said "the brothers and sisters are running the city" at an NAACP rally?

Even his dealings with the terribly named Notlim, his brother Milton's company, have revealed no legal corruption. Street's been in politics for a long time now. Either he obeys the law, or he's avoided getting caught for over 20 years. Please: Street's so bumbling in public that if he were breaking the law, he'd probably reveal that fact at an anti-crime rally.

Street's aloof manner has turned off some voters, but his programs have been productive. He's running as "the neighborhood mayor," and he's done a lot of good things to try and improve Philadelphia's neighborhoods. The former community activist made good on his campaign promises.

Operation Safe Streets has not been a complete success -- drug dealers talked to in a recent issue of The Philadelphia Independent say they've just had to switch corners -- but 74 percent of Philadelphia residents said the program was working in a recent Keystone Survey conducted by Millersville University. Among the 10 largest American cities, Philadelphia reduced property crime the most between 1999 and 2002. An analysis by The Philadelphia Inquirer concluded that crime was down in 19 of the city's 23 police districts since Street took office.

There's more: Philadelphia schools are state-run, a Street-backed plan, and are improving. While Neighborhood Transformation Initiative is starting slow, it has promise. Auto insurance rates are down. Thousands of abandoned cars are off the streets. The city has two new stadiums -- although, given the recent play of the Eagles, perhaps this is a nod to Katz.

Katz isn't a horrible man, and he's not an idiot. And if Katz becomes mayor, the city won't fall apart. I could be wrong in endorsing Street; I can admit that.

If you're a registered Philadelphia voter, please head to the polls on Tuesday. Vote for who you think is the best candidate.

Don't just throw rocks.

Daniel McQuade is a senior English major from Philadelphia, Pa. and managing editor of 34th Street magazine.

Comments (6)

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

It's obvious that all of you who support Street are not property owners (given many of you are students that's to be expected), but let me tell you that Street is crushing the average home owner with spiraling tax increases. Most of the people on my block are life long Democrats who voted for Street before but never again. Some people are considering selling their homes which they have lived in for decades because of the terrible tax burden. The hatred for Street is so palpable these people can barely mention Street's name without boiling over. These are not rich people I'm talking about. These are life long Philadelphians who are being squeezed out by Street's destructive fiscal policies. While I don't think Katz will be very effective, at least he will not continue to devastate hard working Philadelphians with ever increasing taxes. bc

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

Dear NS, You keep on spouting the same drivel all over the place without saying anything. So I went to your website. I asked a question. I got a response that started, "Dear Sir or Madam". The form letter didn't have anything to do with my question. So I responded back (to I think Rebecca Shapiro) and haven't heard anything. Katz is a better candidate, but Street obviously has better people working for him. Katz continues to talk about John Street while Street continues to talk about Philadelphia. No wonder he's winning in the polls. Henry

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

Excuse me? Who cares that Street said "the brothers and sisters are running the city?" For one, I do! When he made that comment at the NAACP convention he certainly wasn't talking about Philadelphians in general. He was talking about African-Americans. If a white person said something to the same effect, they would have him thrown out of office for being a racist. Trent Lott had to step down from his position because of a racial comment. Oh, but he's white so its not acceptable for him to be racist. While I agree that neither of the candidates are exceptional, I am voting for Sam Katz. I'm voting for Katz, Law Student Philadelphia

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

WAKE UP, PHILADELPHIA! The city has continued to see an exodus of residents, businesses, and jobs. Crime is up and arrests are down. City Hall is polluted with croynism and nepotism. It's time for change, progress, and reform. It's time for a progressive, inclusive, and visionary leader. It's time to make Philadelphia a competitive 21st century city. IT'S TIME FOR SAM KATZ. VOTE Sam Katz for Mayor on Tuesday, November 4th, 2003. NS

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

The onyl reason we haven't seen a Street indictment yet is because the Philadelphia system and the ignorant voters of this city are just as crooked as he is Wake the hell up Tin Cup Man

Reader

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm

Flag this comment

If only Dan Gomez, Dan Kaplan, Rory Levine, and Rebecca Rosner could write a column this honest. Daniel McQuade knows what the regular columnists don't know: You don't need to pretend you know everything. Mac Hudson, consultant

Comments are closed for this item.